In 1987, based on an examination of cases and rulings, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Rev. Rul. 87-41, 1987-1 C.B. 296 that lists 20 factors that may be examined in determining whether an employer-employee relationship exists. In 2020, these factors and this revenue ruling are still relied upon by the IRS to make the determination as to the proper classification of workers as employees or independent contractors.
The 20 factors identified by the IRS are as follows:
If the person for whom the services are performed has the right to require compliance with instructions, this indicates employee status.
Worker training (e.g., by requiring attendance at training sessions) indicates that the person for whom services are performed wants the services performed in a particular manner (which indicates employee status).
Integration of the worker’s services into the business operations of the person for whom services are performed is an indication of employee status.
If the services are required to be performed personally, this is an indication that the person for whom services are performed is interested in the methods used to accomplish the work (which indicates employee status).
If the person for whom services are performed hires, supervises or pays assistants, this generally indicates employee status. However, if the worker hires and supervises others under a contract pursuant to which the worker agrees to provide material and labor and is only responsible for the result, this indicates independent contractor status.
A continuing relationship between the worker and the person for whom the services are performed indicates employee status.
The establishment of set hours for the worker indicates employee status.
If the worker must devote substantially full time to the business of the person for whom services are performed, this indicates employee status. An independent contractor is free to work when and for whom he or she chooses.
If the work is performed on the premises of the person for whom the services are performed, this indicates employee status, especially if the work could be done elsewhere.
If a worker must perform services in the order or sequence set by the person for whom services are performed, that shows the worker is not free to follow his or her own pattern of work, and indicates employee status.
A requirement that the worker submit regular reports indicates employee status.
Payment by the hour, week, or month generally points to employment status; payment by the job or a commission indicates independent contractor status.
If the person for whom the services are performed pays expenses, this indicates employee status. An employer, to control expenses, generally retains the right to direct the worker.
The provision of significant tools and materials to the worker indicates employee status.
Investment in facilities used by the worker indicates independent contractor status.
A worker who can realize a profit or suffer a loss as a result of the services (in addition to profit or loss ordinarily realized by employees) is generally an independent contractor.
If a worker performs more than de minimis services for multiple firms at the same time, that generally indicates independent contractor status.
If a worker makes his or her services available to the public on a regular and consistent basis, that indicates independent contractor status.
The right to discharge a worker is a factor indicating that the worker is an employee.
If a worker has the right to terminate the relationship with the person for whom services are performed, at any time he or she wishes without incurring liability, then such right may be indicative of employee status.
The IRS warns that the degree of importance of each factor varies depending on the occupation and the factual context in which the services are performed. They caution that factors other than the listed 20 factors may also be relevant.
More recently, the IRS in Independent Contractor or Employee? Training Materials, Training 3320-102 (10-96) TPDS 84238I, at 2-7 has identified three categories of evidence that may be relevant in determining whether the requisite control exists under the common-law test and has grouped illustrative factors under these three categories: (1) behavioral control; (2) financial control; and (3) relationship of the parties. The IRS emphasizes that factors in addition to the 20 factors identified in 1987 may be relevant, that the weight of the factors may vary based on the circumstances, that relevant factors may change over time, and that all facts must be examined.
Employers should strenuously and objectively check their independent contractors against the 20 common-law factors, knowing that these are intended as guidelines, not as strict rules. The focus here is on the real substance of the arrangement—whether the person for whom the services are performed exercises sufficient control to classify the worker as an employee.
Employers need to be objective and look closely at the factors that they are currently not meeting. An organization is looking for problems when they merely designate a worker as an independent contractor when a majority, but not all, of the 20 common-law factors shows he or she is an employee.
Employers need to speak with their accountant or tax attorney to make an objective assessment of their exposure where there is any possibility of mis-classification of workers.
Hiring Steven was quite possibly the best decision of my life! Steven took the time to hear every single one of my concerns and address them in an extremely clear, concise and thorough manner. He guided me through the notoriously complicated and stressful process of probate with the utmost of compassion and dedication. Thank you Steven!
I highly recommend Steven J. Fromm for all your estate and tax planning needs. He has the most complete and thorough knowledge of current as well as pending federal, state, and local tax codes of any professional that I have ever been involved with. His ability to totally sort out your current financial condition and relate it to a plan to minimize your tax liability and allow you to sleep at night is without equal. He is professional, timely, creative, and an advocate for your needs, whether its personal or business. You can be assured that you will be well taken care of, with cutting edge/ sound financial and tax advice by Steven J. Fromm.
I have always found Steve to be very responsive, accurate and creative in legal matters presented to him. He demonstrates a good business sense. We have collaborated on several highly technical issues over the years. I look forward to our continuing relationship.
Steven has been instrumental in helping my partner and I to create a secure and satisfying estate plan, which meets or exceeds all of our wishes and contains contingencies for everything from medical issues to wealth management and living wills. In this process, Steven has also become a friend. If you need Estate Planning, Tax Advice, a Will or a trust, etc., we highly recommend Steven Fromm, Esquire. He will listen and be sensitive to your unique situation.
Steve is an excellent attorney who has provided help for my family personally for business, tax, and other services for many years. He is extremely knowledgeable and thorough, and is extremely good at explaining legal concepts to me in clear terms understandable to a non-attorney. It is difficult to pick only three attributes above, since Steve’s work meets most if not all of the attributes above.
Steve is an excellent corporate attorney who has a deep understanding of corporate law, taxes and estate planning. He’s been extremely helpful to me in keeping my many companies and business ventures organized, focused and squeaky clean. He’s very strong in estate planning and wealth preservation as well. Finally, his follow through is air tight and utterly dependable.
Steven is a trusted adviser. We depend on him for so many things. He is patient, listens to our needs and makes excellent suggestions. He is extremely talented. We value his advice and have recommended him unhesitatingly to friends and family.
Steve Fromm is a superb lawyer and I highly recommend him! After a terrible experience with a previous lawyer concerning an estate administration, I entered his office feeling very deflated, confused and discouraged. However, I left his office feeling enthusiastic and eager to get down to business. My situation was very unique, I needed his expertise for an array of things and Steve was able to address all of my needs. With a limited timeframe and an extreme amount of obstacles to overcome he worked meticulously, diligently and accomplished extraordinary results. His professionalism is incomparable and I am forever grateful.